The Need for Gun Control

Shortly after dusk, a sixteen-year-old male child stands on the street corner talking with a maven about what happened at school today between himself and another student. He nonchalantly stands there sipping his Pepsi when in all of a sudden a shameful Honda with tinted windows drives up to the corner. The window rolls batch, a voice calls out, and the boy walks up to the car. He bends d avow to peer into the car to see who it is when three rounds from a .38 caliber pistol rip through his chest and neck. The other boy frantically runs off into the distance. He stumbles backwards and trips on the curb back him and settles to the sidewalk the car speeds off into the dark alleyway crosswise the street. The young boy struggles to breathe as he coughs up blood. He chokes to death with every effort to breathe. He dies a minute or two later. These kinds of events be all too familiar to us and cark us as we see an increasing lean of hand ordnances fall into the pass of the young. I am shocked at the sight of these events where innocent children atomic number 18 being wedgened down on the street because of petty little argu handsts everyplace something so minuscule as a pair of shoes, a exceptional type of jacket, or simply scantily a misinterpreted look. I suppose that much strict handgun regulations ar a must in todays participation. Im not expression that we comport to ban handguns, but we feel to meditate legislative measures in order to limit the possibility of handguns falling into the reach or youths. Peter Annin and Tom Morganthau state that according to the Federal g everywherenment agency of Investigations Uniform Crime Report, murders committed by someones under(a) the age of xviii who were arrested jumped from 1,193 in 1985 to 2982 in 1994. 1 This report shows a substantial increase in the number of killings by slew who are under the age of eighteen. most(prenominal) of these people are often participants in gangs and involved with drugs. Many of these people find that guns are a much easier method to defeat his or her opponent in a quarrel. This problem is made worse by the increasing availability of guns. Residents of gang-ridden areas are afraid to leave their homes for fear that their children or themselves might fall victim to a gunshot. I see that many people happen we need tighter control over the sale of handguns bit many others reckon that we shouldnt. Many people say that it is a pay off to own firearms and handguns in this country because it is guaranteed by the blink of an eye amendment of the United States Constitution. The second amendment states, A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to stay and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. First of all, very few states today in the U. S. have militias because we have the five branches of the U.S. Military, the Army, Navy, Marines, Airforce, and Coast Guard. The military provides thi s country with enough support to stand off any war levying or belligerent tribes. That is the militarys obligatory advise today. There is no necessity for a state-run military. The U.S. Militarys purpose is to keep this pour down free. Second, the Bill of Rights was designed to value the people from our government should it transcend to tyranny. These laws and rights were naturalized in the period of colonial times when monarchies and dictatorships were commonplace in society. Today, theyre just about non-existent except for subtle hints of them in communist governments which exist in areas such as the Peoples Republic of China. We have no need to protect ourselves from the possibility of a dictatorial government materializing from our democracy because it is racyly unconvincing that this would occur. The United Nations, which the United States is a member of, would not allow this because their briny function is to stop the spread of communism. We are not living in that era anymore and that is why I rely that guns arent really postulate that much by civilians.As I mentioned before, Im not suggesting that we, the people, totally ban guns. Firearms and handguns steady have their recreational purpose in society. For a lot of people, the summercater of hunting wild game is an enjoyable pastime and tradition that has been passed down through the ages. People have always hunted. From Paleolithic man to the snapper Ages and to the present, hunting has and provides us with fodder even though that same food can be getd at the local supermarket. separate activities such as tar loll shooting and enrollment in gun clubs are in any case enjoyable. They are sports, just like any other sports, that give men and women a sense of pride and satisfaction that fulfills the primitive instinct of aspiration in our minds.Another important argument among civilians of the country is that if more restrictions on firearms and handguns are passed, this would gradually le ad to a total ban on all guns sometime in the future. In an article written by Robert J. Blendon, fast one T. Young, and David Hemenway, they include a Gallup/CNN/USA Today poll which shows how gun owners, non-owners, and the nation as a whole were surveyed. Sixty-five percent of all people, including owners of guns and non-owners, remember that stricter legislation would gradually lead to a total ban on all guns. In addition, a majority of gun owners, approximately cardinal percent, believe that these laws would violate the second amendment of the U. S. Constitution while non-owners don not believe this. The survey was asking about how stricter laws would reduce certain aspects cogitate to guns. The national figure is sixty-nine percent for those who believe that stricter laws would reduce the number of people killed by guns in arguments. Sixty-eight percent of the nation believe that laws would reduce the number of accidental deaths and suicides attributed to guns. Fifty-eight percent of the nation learns that more laws would reduce furious crime. However, in both cases of owners and non-owners, the difference of agreement is over twenty percentage points in favor of non-gun owners. 2 I certainly agree that stricter legislation would definitely reduce the number of gun-related deaths and that if handguns were restricted from the hands of minor league and criminals, the rate and recidivism rate, the rate of repeat offenders, of violent crime would be reduced. I believe that we need more strict laws to curb some of the violent crime that is being committed by Americas youth. I also believe that the National Rifle Association of America (NRA) will not allow the government ban all firearms since the NRA is the biggest lobbyist in the gun control surround today because it has so many active members. Finally, most people feel that they need handguns for protection of their property and themselves. I believe that protection of your own property, such as you home, is perfectly fine, but if you carry a gun around for protection, that can become dangerous. For example, gang members who carry guns are an great threat to others. If someone should irritate or annoy them, they might mayhap resort to using his or her gun on that person. Innocent children and bystanders could fall victim to a stray bullet. Minor arguments could erupt into bloodshed on the street corner or in a dark alleyway. Other people are also a possible threat, especially to practice of law officers. If for some reason, a gun-toting civilian was pulled over for a traffic violation, that person could decide to shoot that police officer in an attempt to get away. This would cause major problems in society. Another thing is that people under the influence of drugs or alcohol might use their guns on psyche without reason because of impaired reasoning and judgment associated with inebriation. Now Im not motto every person would be and is like that, but there are some people that are. I believe that this presents a danger to society and why handgun access and sales should be restricted. I believe that we need tougher legislation on handguns. Citizens should be registered for each and every gun he or she owns and that they should be obligated to pay a high fee for that registration. Also, juveniles and convicted felons that have already served time should not be permitted to purchase or possess and handgun. I believe that if someone who has purchased a handgun, should be required by federal law to take a sentry go and training course in order to lawfully possess a handgun. This course would be directed by the federal government and would date that a handgun purchasers record would be checked out. This country should have tougher laws in order to restrict handgun access and sale. Im not saying this will wrench, but it will be a step preceding in the direction of effective gun control. If we and the government can work together on it, we can slowly mi nimize the problem and keep guns out of the wrong hands.Bibliography1 Annin, Peter Morganthau, Tom. The lull before the storm? Newsweek 4 December 19952 Blendon, Robert J. Hemenway, David Young, John T. The American public and the gun control moot The Journal of the American Medical Association 12 June 19963Historical military positionhttp//essaylab.com/blog/gun-control